
Google made a huge splash when it announced its plans for the Chrome operating system, a web-centric OS where essentially everything is run through a web browser. One fantastic promise of Google’s Chrome OS is the arrival of low-cost, lightweight hardware, since most of the storage and additional data handling is done in the cloud. Perhaps that 100-dollar computer will finally become a reality.
But there is a problem. A rather huge one. The strength of the Chrome OS, that it makes maximum use of online resources, also limits its potential adoption. To have any real use of the OS you need a decent Internet connection, and that has some significant implications we need to look at.
Before we even discuss broadband, let us initially get one piece of statistic out in the open: 74% of the world populace doesn’t have Internet access. At all.
In additional words, 5 billion of the world’s 6.8 billion public will have small use for Google’s Chrome OS because they don’t have Internet access.
This is the current Internet penetration shown by region:
Google’s Chrome OS is a fantastic thought. Place as much as possible into the cloud, and keep the physical device as a “thin client” to access this functionality. Though, this fantastic depence on Internet connectivity has left the OS virtually useless for the vast majority of the world populace, especially those who would have benefited the most from a low-cost, lightweight computer.
Now that a $100 computer is really starting to look plausible, it’s ironic that those in right need of one won’t be able to use it. It will remain a luxury item, a secondary computer to those better off.
The numbers so far have been in this area Internet access, any kind, but to properly use a Web OS like the Chrome OS, you really need a broadband connection. This disqualifies an even larger percentage of the populace. The mere thought of downloading and uploading documents and additional data over an ancient dial-up connection makes us shiver.
So how common is broadband? Not as common as you might expect. For example, in the United States, 74.1% of the populace has Internet access, but as of 2008, only 57% were accessing the Internet over a broadband connection. You could say that this makes Chrome OS unusable to 43% of the US populace.
| Public | Internet penetration (total) | Broadband Internet penetration |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 74.1% | 57% |
| Canada | 74.9% | 65% |
| United Kingdom | 76.4% | 55% |
| Australia | 80.1% | 59% |
| France | 69.3% | 54% |
| Spain | 71.8% | 49% |
| Germany | 65.9% | 47% |
| Sweden | 89.2% | 54% |
| Japan | 75.5% | 55% |
These countries are just a few examples to give you an thought of what the broadband penetration tends to look like. More examples can be found on ITIF’s homepage.
And remember that “broadband” isn’t always very excellent either. It’s usually defined as 256 kbps and up, and that lower spectrum of the broadband definition is hardly a performance monster. Downloading just one megabyte over a 256 kpbs connection takes more than 30 seconds even under ideal circumstances. Many web pages are larger than that.
So even among those who by definition have broadband Internet access, many will have far from an ideal experience of Chrome OS.
Don’t get us incorrect, we at Pingdom like the concept behind Google’s Chrome OS. It’s just that we haven’t seen anyone mention this whole dilemma, so we wanted to shine some light on the actual implications of an OS that is virtually useless without Internet access.
That said, we’d like to end on an optimistic note. The thought behind the Chrome OS does hold a lot of promise. In a sense it’s a throwback to the ancient days of mainframes and terminals, where computing resources and storage are centralized and accessible by modest hardware on the user end. As Internet penetration spreads, more and more public will be able to benefit from this often cost-saving model where they don’t have to spend so much on hardware.
Data sources:
Broadband penetration data from ITIF (2008).
Internet penetration data from Internet World Stats (2009).

From:
74% of the world, Google’s Chrome OS is not for you